Scream Chocula, Scream! ([info]r_lex) wrote,
@ 2008-12-02 13:05:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
You Sad, Desperate Fuck.

If I were a straw, I'd be filing charges over all the grasping at my person that was going on.


(Post a new comment)


[info]contrasoma
2008-12-02 09:37 pm UTC (link)
Damn, that's getting into the "Joe The Plumber" playbook of desperation. I honestly thought that El-Vest would've had some sort of contingency plan in place for all of this.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]ringthebells
2008-12-02 09:49 pm UTC (link)
I just have to say, I love that icon!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]ajxl
2008-12-02 09:49 pm UTC (link)
Here's what I wonder: was this calculated and he actually thinks no one would call him on it, or did someone just tell him this happened and he went with it? To paraphrase Rex Murphy from last night (which I rarely do), Harper's either arrogant or stupid. The first one's never really been in question, but the last couple of weeks are making me wonder about the second one.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]big_paul
2008-12-03 03:49 pm UTC (link)
There was an editorial in the Globe and Mail (that I unfortunately can't find right now...) saying that Harper's desire to not just defeat, but to destroy, the opposition verges on the pathological, and that it represents a real blind spot in Harper's judgment.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]rheo3000
2008-12-02 11:06 pm UTC (link)
Oh jesus ... that's sweet.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]jsangspar
2008-12-03 01:44 am UTC (link)
Not as sweet as the icon I've been dreaming about since I was like FOUR. Man screw the pandas; WRASSLIN'

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]dragonappartion
2008-12-03 01:48 am UTC (link)
Oh yo. That reminds me we need to talk fish cooking.

(Reply to this)


[info]big_paul
2008-12-03 03:09 pm UTC (link)
"“They had to be photographed without it because a member of their coalition does not even believe in the country.”

Uh, is that like not believing in Santa Claus?

I never thought I'd be defending the BQ, but let's keep in mind that the Bloc isn't functionally a separatist party currently. They're more like the Reform Party in 1993 or so - a regional protest party, following the ideological and philosophical tradition of the region in question.

The Bloc didn't talk about separatism last election, the talked about defending the interests of Quebec. Reminds me of another politician saying "the west wants in".

(Reply to this)


[info]big_paul
2008-12-03 03:18 pm UTC (link)
Speaking of desperate, check the editorial in the globe suggesting that Harprer's current strategy may mean sacrificing Quebec.

Quebec, the only place where last election, there were enough seats for Harper to potentially get a majority?

Way to make sure the BQ is here to stay, eh?

(Reply to this)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…